These Trying Times

In these so called "Trying Times", Ignorance is in abundance.

Maybe according to Hindu traditions, we really are in the Age of Kali. Where profound ignorance and astute malign rages and will only increase until the Age has passed and with it much of Humanity.

In much of the World, though I speak in particular of the United States of America, the 'ol Turtle Island.

Governments and Agencies in many forms have steered away from free thinking education and are and have been, mass producing "educated idiots".

Masses of Consumers who are taught to believe whatever their masters tell them to believe. Watch what they are told to watch. Think what they are told to think.

One only have to look around at our self deprecating system.

That feeds itself, propaganda "Programming" is everywhere. In our Commercials, in our Cinemas, in our Education systems, in our News centers, even on our Cereal boxes.

This system feeds on our so called "base instincts". Teaching us to 'React' without thinking. To 'Think' by obeying and to 'Obey' without question.

Order is good, it keeps some sensibilities and decreases harm. But when is too much order, too much?

Like a Totalitarian hand squeezing the life and everything out of a country. More and more people blinded by self indulgence and covetousness. Deign to take what they want in lieu of helping.

Yes it is possible many are just delusional or dis-illusioned. And with bad information seek to react like feral animals will. Seek and Destroy!

However, many or some, some who are very rich and or in positions of great power (corporate conglomerates, governments, families of constant and ancient heritage), are feeding the beast, so to speak.

There is an agenda here folks. And it does not include any of us except for us to exterminate each other.

We are not loved by these elitists and we are only seen as animals and fodder for their goals. They themselves have said so, in biographies they wrote, even on live national television.

They don't want us to Reason, to Critically Think. They don't want us to listen, just act on vengeful emotions.

They especially don't want us to understand that you can't judge history with modern perceptions.
It is like trying to fit the circle into a square hole.

Yes, bad and terrible thing have happened in the past.
Yet if we get rid of all the reminders to avoid such things. As Humans we will inevitably forget. Especially if those in the 'Powers that Be' continue to white wash history.

And the rest of us follow blindly into the Abyss.

We are all being divided so that we cannot, are not able to stand up against even greater threats.

A people divided are a people easily conquered.

There is a lesson in every tragedy, which gives us an opportunity to grow, to learn from it.

Will we? Or will we all continue down this self destructive path that has been hand picked for us!?

R. William Holzkopf Jr.
Copyright © 2017 R. William Holzkopf Jr.

Post Script

 I cannot say for truth that I see the whole of the whole, though I do see the meanderings of such.
And on such a point, the Truth is that it is bigger than the whole of us and we have been decieved by our very own for longer than we'd like to admit.

Who can hate one for speaking the truth?
And yet there are many who are so very caught up in vengeful spite of emotional turmoil.

That they seek only to destroy what is different instead of working to understand such differences and bridging the gap.

As ignorance and self glorifying stupidity raise ugly hands again in so many years after the so called fall of Facism and Communism.

We see a group of people, mostly young and easily set to emotionalism.

Who act just like the Fascists of old, claiming superiority over so called zealots. While accusing, shaming and harming, anyone who is not them.

Their actions are not that of those who wish for peace and non-facist ways. Their actions have a purpose that is anethema to a functioning society. To peacekeepers and good Citizens everywhere who prefer to walk amongst there fellow Humans without orchestrated violence and wish also to prevent Totaltarianism.

The fuel for this fire has always been the same people who these so called 'anti-facists' claim to hate. Rich white men and their corporate thuggery.

The alt-left and the alt-right say the same things and do the same things just under different symbols and different names. Claiming always that they are here to protect everyone from calamity while causing the very thing they claim to prevent.

In the end this is both a distraction from real events unfolding above the din and clamour of regular Human cattle. As well as a tool to divide us all so that we cannot unite against the real enemy when the time comes that we must.

Free The Nipple

" I think the real obscenity comes from raising our youth to believe that sex is bad and ugly and dirty, and yet it is heroic to go spill guts and blood in the most ghastly manner in the name of humanity."
-Larry Flint

I support #freethenipple not because it is easy or different or counter-culture; but because it is right.

This is not about the approved abusive hyper-sensitized sex industry that sells adults and kids sex through commercials, ads and film.

This is about true gender equality. How the chest of a Woman should be O.K. at all times, not just in certain dictated situations and places.

Puritanical culture and various religious institutions have shamed women for centuries across the World.

All the while allowing Men to do, what are crimes for Woman in most places.

Our current cultural institutions brainwash people to see this as wrong. The only wrong is that there is still in this modern age, backwards notions of control over any of the sexes.

Some are trying to label this as a Feminist movement. If it becomes that, then it is broken, and I hope not.

Feminism is by its original founders a guerrilla warfare against Male society.
In an attempt to replace one sex over the other. That is not gender equality, that is replacing one system of control over another.

This movement is not feminism,  though it is about Females and their natural Rights.

I do not know what it should be called other than what it already is; Gender Equality and Rights for the Female, the Women of the World.

-R. William Holzkopf Jr.

A word on the movement:
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/freethenipple

Good thoughts on the matter:
http://www.uloop.com/news/view.php/146535/FreeTheNipple-And-Feminism

Twitter

Youtube

FL $1 September 25th 2014

FL $1: https://www.facebook.com/events/314702448627531/
https://www.facebook.com/FreeLoveOneDollar

Image Courtesy FL$1

Mike Morris;

A person I considered a Best friend, still do regardless of the circumstances.

Mike was a very helpful person and would go all out in effort toward that end.

He also was a fan of random acts of kindness.

In keeping with that ideology, Mike's family lead by his sister (Andi), decided to honour his memory by participating on his birthday,  the [Free Love $1] event him and his sister started some years back randomly one day (a very admirable act).

So today September 25th, 2014; many people in the United States as well as around the World are participating in his honour.

Speaking to the fact that Mike was very personable and had connections worldwide.

So if you are participating,  or are considering. Congratulations, I am thrilled to know that his memory lives on.

I however am doing things differently this year, regardless of what his Family has stated about the event (that it should be done on his Birthday; I in no uncertain terms mean any disrespect by this).

I cannot speak for Mike, however Having known him and been close personal friends with him. I know he liked to keep people guessing when it came to charity.

Charity is not something to be expected,  maybe not even desired. It is something one freely gives when suffering is seen or you want to uplift someone. It is in effect a physical way to spread positive and good energy to others.

So today,  I celebrate his birthday, him. Who he was and is and what things he left the World for us to consider and act upon.

I am glad many others will be honouring his memory today through FL $1. But I will be celebrating that my friend was born into this World, and that  I chanced meeting him and having him enrich my life so very much!

Thank you Mike for being apart of my life and giving me so very many possible things to look forward to and do.

Without you I would be most definitely less of a person.

This drink if Absente is for you!

Best Regards,
R. William Holzkopf Jr.

P.S.
Tomorrow, will be filled with random acts of kindness.

Kauft nicht bei... Brendan Eich

"kauft nicht bei..." {Don't buy from...} the rallying cry of the HJ and Brown Shirts of Nazi Germany in the 1930's, to expel Jews or Jew Sympathizers.

This is a clear abuse by philosophically Left people; That a person only has Freedom of Speech, the Freedom to choose when it suits the Left or Socialist Cause, not because they have any Rights or anything.

"The newly elected CEO and co-founder of Mozilla - the maker of the Firefox web browser - was forced into resignation today after activists pressured the company over his donation to a political campaign that opposed same-sex marriage. "

A persons right to contribute to who ever they deem fit to take office (in the U.S.A.), whether or not we agree with that Campaign or Individual, is a 'Right'. If you don't like it take your business elsewhere. I could see getting the Co-Founder of Mozilla to resign if he made Mozilla and or Firefox unaccessible to certain groups of Humans in the U.S., or even if he caused physical harm to another person.

But to ruin a persons life just because you disagree ideologically or philosophically or even religiously is a VERY dangerous road to go down, and it tramples on my RIGHTS, too!

I don't think you'd want to be forced out of your job or pushed into the street or have your peers slander and libel you, just because you support Gay Rights or are Homosexual yourself. Then how is it Right to do the same to someone else for their beliefs? It isn't and it is called Tyranny; to force someone else to be like you (or how you want them to be), or face the consequences for not.

#Mozilla #BrendanEich #Firefox

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/04/mozilla_ceo_forced_out_over_opposition_to_gay_marriage.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook

Whose version?

Whose version of "how the World should be" is right? When you look at the past 24.2 years at least, any logic reasoned person Learned in Common sense would agree the direction we have been on here in the United States alone is not indicative of sanity. 

The population is being strangled financially, our tax monies abused and mis-allocated consistently and constantly. A gov. set up to defend individual freedoms and state rights is now practically 180° from its intended purpose. Our free choices are now considered, weighted and decided by a small group of people in Washington D.C. through banking and corporate interests, and then forced upon us in the most unconstitutional manners. 

And all the 'distracted' folks ignore or worse don't even understand their situation due to either self imposed ignorance or Public gov. education. 

People still then have the gall to tell me I'm wrong, misdirected and stupid.
All the while though, the U.S. dollars has lost approx. 35% of its value in just these past 10 years.
Most of our leaders lie, blatantly, nearly everyday. Things that affect not only the place we live (Our Country), but also our lives. 
Our food chain, air and water is poisoned in most places, sicknesses related to these poisons is on the rise, and it's like looking at sheep or cattle being herded when the population is told these things. They violently protest in denial against the self evident truths, a psychological response when ones Reality is shaken.  

Our society is being taught to be its own pariah, creating a completely unsustainable future. 
We are being told and forced in some cases that we are not allowed to defend our own personal individual self against attack, that the gov. And law enforcement will do it for us, yet they cannot even fix their own issues, or help properly in time of need. Especially recently more and more law abiding Citizens are being harassed, beat, raped and killed by the same people telling us they will defend us. 

We are given solutions to problems created by the same people and groups. Often the same things with new wording. The definition of insanity; Doing the same thing over and over again with the same result but expecting different.  Either we as Citizens are being setup by an elaborate plan made to do just this or everyone has completely lost any sense of intelligence and we deserve everything we get.

Ignoring the nature of a thing, is bound to be dangerous.  I don't know what way is right, however the current way is most definitely not!

R. William Holzkopf Jr.

Paradoxical Quote of the Day

From Ben Stein

-Via Carl Paladino

Of course Ben Stein denies ever saying such a thing (which doesn't make it any less true), but he did say; this.

Failure to launch (whoops)... Deliver

So after the debate with himself, President Obama successfully gave the World and the American Citizens, absolutely nothing.

"Obama claims the “debate” — in which no debate opponent was given a minute at the microphone — is valuable.  But the whistleblowers who create such debates “endanger” us, Obama says.  This he claims without evidence.
If the debate was so useful, why not give the man who made you hold it with yourself his passport back?
Obama began Friday’s speech with a Sarah Palinesque bit of Paul Revere history.  Revere is now an honorary NSA spy. In reality, the British would have hit Revere with a hellfire missile if Obama had been their king. It all depends on which side of a war you imagine someone to be on, and on whether you imagine war itself is an acceptable form of human behavior at this late date.  Without the endless war on the world, the need for secrecy would go away, and with it the powers that secrecy bestows, and with them the arrogant speeches by rulers who clearly hold us all in contempt.
Obama’s promises not to abuse unchecked secret powers (and implied promise that none of his successors or subordinates will abuse them either) is not credible, or acceptable, while it just might be impeachable.  We’re talking here about the same government that listens in on soldiers’ phone sex, Congress members’ daily lives, and everything it can get its hands on related to the actual, rather than rhetorical, promotion of liberty, justice, or peace.  A report today quotes various members of the government with security clearance who want to murder Edward Snowden.  We’re supposed to just trust them with the right to or persons, houses, papers, and effects without probably cause or warrant? Are we also to trust the corporations they ask to do their dirty work, should the theoretical future reform of this outrage involve paying corporations to own our info?" -washingtonblog

Senator Rand Paul responds to this with:

“The American people should not expect the fox to guard the hen house,” Paul said about Obama’s promise to appoint a special White House oversight director to keep a watchful eye over the security programs." -washingtonblog

It goes without saying, if you're not getting what your paying for, either get your money back or get a new thing.

DEMs support GOP to condemn the State Department for Benghazi

"Congressional Democrats for the first time joined the GOP to condemn the State Department for refusing security measures they say could have prevented the deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans in Benghazi." -USAToday

So what... the President and Hillary lied? OMG!
Oh? Not enough proof? Let's roll over to the New Yorker:

"Some of the decisions to turn down or not request more security were made in Benghazi, and some were made in Washington; this was more than a single misjudgment...Who would protect the mission, then? The locals, who were on our side—or whose side we had been on in the war to remove Muammar Qaddafi from power.
David Kirkpatrick, in a long story for the Times, describes how various members of those militias might have been found in amiable conversations with diplomats before the attacks and then complicit in it the night it happened." -the New Yorker

However, while other mainstream Liberal media were for once reporting the real news;
the L.A.Times was missing the mark completely again... seemingly on purpose.

No wealth to redistribute!

OH!? You want something for Free but don't want to do anything to get it?
Oh Tax the Rich to feed the poor? Yeah what happens when the Rich flee, how will you 'Redistribute' wealth when there is none!?

Failure of Collectivism staring you in the face yet many still support it under the guise of helping others and healthcare.

Don't say I and others didn't warn you. When people start considering the current Commonwealth of Russia a better place than what's looking more and more like 'Soviet Amerika'. It shows there is an actually real issue here, a White Elephant in the room that the vast majority are not talking about and considering.

Amazon workers reject Union

This is an interesting topic that will defiantly draw lines with people.
I'm in the middle on this and I'll tell you why.

In current form Unions in America are all based on the same models set forth in the 1800's. They were presented as a way to protect Workers Rights against the Wealthy who were taking advantage of them.

In this i have no issue.

What is rarely talked about is that Those Unions were set up on purpose by those same Wealthy people to maintain control over the said workers. Granted they made some concessions, but in the overall they gained even more control over the workers, in so doing coming out even more on top than before.

A Union worker In some Unions, is threatened with loss of their Union membership and possibly their job if they don't vote along the lines the Union wants. If you are ousted from Membership, since the majority of jobs a person required a union to get hired for in the first place, one is either forced to learn a skill set that does not require union membership or remain unemployed.

There is a lot of coercion and harassment involved, that some former Union members fight to change.

A lot of these Unions are still funded by 'Big' money Rich Entrepreneurs who benefit by keeping the Workers in line and punishing dissent within the ranks.

But with out Unions the Workers have no job protection, can be forced to work unreasonable hours (regardless of labor laws), and forget about getting sick and keeping your job. What? It's called the Family and Medical Leave Act you say?

How many of you were fired because you were actually sick, you called in and even got a Doctors note. Well I know a lot of people and I have experienced this myself. The fact is all a company has to do is find another reason to fire you and it doesn't even have to make sense. Some companies even have you sign paperwork (that most don't read), that states they can for you for 'no reason' (read the fine print), and these are companies without Unions>

Do we need a workers protection system, Yes. Are the Current Union Systems good? No, most aren't.

Amazon Employees are probably being offered good incentives to prevent Union activities. Meaning the vote against Union is in favor of Amazon and this Union 'not to be' would have at least (initially), been in control of the workers and unfavorable to Amazon.

Life really blows hard sometimes doesn't it!?

No Fan of LDS but Marriage is a separate issue all together

I am no fan of the LDS (for very clear reasons), however people seem to forget that Religious institutions in America are 'PRIVATE' organizations. They can offer whatever they want and refuse whatever they want, within the limits of Constitutional law.

Marriage beyond that of a Man and Woman, is a State issue, not a Religious or Federal issue. The State if compelled by the People by voting will or will not allow Civil Unions of Non-Man & Woman unions. However forcing a Private Organization, just like Forcing a Private Individual to do something against themselves is yet Unconstitutional, since Individual Rights are originally protected and Religious Right also under the 1st Amendment and the 9th Amendment.

A Gay person wouldn't want to be forced to marry a straight person of the opposite sex?

Stop violating the Rights of Religious organizations and focus your efforts on the States. And realize that there are Religious institutions in America and Canada that offer Religious Marriage regardless of what their respective peers decree.

there are over 100 churches in America and Canada (even throughout the World), that offer this, ranging from Lutheran, Pentecostal to whatever (like the Anglican Church of Canada, The Lutheran Church of Sweden, the Church of Denmark, the Mennonite Church in the Netherlands, the Affirming Pentecostal Church International and the Global Alliance of Affirming Apostolic Pentecostals, the Unitarian Universalists, and the Swedenborgian Church of North America, as well as British and Canadian Quakers.). Some may not be under the direct authority of those said institutions (some are), but they still preach from their same respective Holy books, only with a more Christlike attitude.

A moral approach to getting Religion to want what you want is by being selfless, and showing who you are and that you have something to offer the community by how you act. Acting like spoiled brats with Fascist intent is not going to have Religious institutions falling over themselves to come over to your side.

Next time you want something that is a violation of Right, remember what it'd be like if someone tried to violate your Right to do or not do something. Remember that the issue is in the hands of the people and therefore a State issue,; Religious Organizations are not apart of the state and therefor our of this scope of influence.

To express otherwise, shows a severe lack of understanding of Religious and Individual freedoms, as well as What Separation of Church and State really means.

Options are available right now and other options are available with a little leg work within your states.

Mexicans are cleaning up our mess!

Mexicans are cleaning up our mess!

Small groups of local vigilantes took up arms and joined forces to storm Paracuaro, headquarters of the Knights Templar gang, where they arrested police officers and seized control of the town in a blaze of gunfire.

They drove into the town in black armoured vehicles shouting 'Don't be frightened, we are vigilantes', before expelling drugs traffickers, whom they accuse of kidnapping people and bribing them to make money.  Several gun battles were reported, leaving at least one dead.

Police officers, were rounded up and arrrested. They are considered to be in league with the Drug Cartels and Corrupt Government Officials. A checkpoint was set up at the entrance to Paracuaro to maintain the order restored by vigilante group known as Public Safety System against the Templar Drug Cartel.

Policing for profit

Without a warrant, the New York Police Department (NYPD) burst into the home of Gerald Bryan in a nighttime raid in March of 2012.  Police punched through walls, tore out light fixtures and seized $4,800 in cash.  Gerald was suspected of distributing drugs and taken into custody.  One year later, the case against him was dropped.  But when Gerald tried to get his money back, he found that it had been deposited into the pension fund for the NYPD.

Max Rivlin-Nadler elaborates at Gothamist:

Damn the Torpedoes, Let us tilt at windmills and bask in the afterglow

Damn the Torpedoes, Let us tilt at windmills and bask in the afterglow.

"The Grand Alliance with Islam? Damn the failures, blunders and self-stultifications, full speed ahead." -Richard Butrick 

In the process of exonerating Clinton, the 8,000-word account by David Kirkpatrick uncovers the two pivotal points of the Obama Doctrine:

(1) Radical Islam in general is not inherently hostile to the US and once they are shown due respect they can become US allies. This may mean weakening ties with our traditional allies.

(2) The only Islamic group that is a bona fide terrorist organization is the faction of al-Qaida directly subordinate to Osama bin Laden's successor, Ayman al-Zawahiri. Only this group cannot be appeased and must be destroyed through force.

This explains:

(1) the attempts to accommodate the Taliban in Afghanistan,

(2) the backing of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt,

(3) the initial backing of the Muslim Brotherhood-dominated Syrian opposition,

(4) siding with the PLO against Israel,

(5) the kid glove treatment given Iran's nuclear policy. In general, any group not in obeisance to Zawahiri is a potential US ally.

-http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/01/the_obama_doctrine_revealed.html

President Bush Jr. had his own prevalent doctrine of interference and intervening, which has led to some of todays current state of affairs, President Obama has continued such ludicrous meanderings, of which will only serve to hurt America in the end. If one thing history should have taught us is that when learning to work with others in the World, especially those of diametrically opposed mentalities; one does not compromise themselves in the process, for fear of losing oneself entirely.

Hell: The Answer

Via: http://www.quickmeme.com/p/3vr3nn

37 People Killed in Colorado Marijuana Legalization

""When was the last time you heard of someone overdosing on beer? All these pro-marijuana groups should be ashamed of themselves. The victims' blood is on their hands."" -http://dailycurrant.com/2014/01/02/marijuana-overdoses-kill-37-in-colorado-on-first-day-of-legalization/

Uhmm Dumbass!It's called Alcohol Poisoning and there are "...approximately 88,000 deaths attributable to excessive alcohol use each year in the United States."
http://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm

Two:
"Marijuana, on the other hand, does not cause overdose deaths and comes with far fewer long-term health consequences. A 2009 Canadian study determined the annual health-related costs associated with alcohol are more than eight times greater per user than with marijuana."
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/22/opinion/riffle-marijuana-safety/

If people are dieing it is because they are mixing, doing something else along with the marijuana. You wouldn't say, take pain medication and drink heavily would you? Oh people do die because of that? Wait a sec!

Cooking the Books on Climate Change

Cooking the books; misstating and representing the "Surveyed" Papers said to support Global Warming to come to a 97% support:

"First the Los Angeles Times, and now the popular website Reddit have banned critical comments on global warming orthodoxy in responses to their articles. Giuseppe Macri of The Daily Caller reports:A content editor on Reddit's science forum wrote Monday that the site has banned climate-change skeptics, and asks why more news outlets haven't done the same."About a year ago, we moderators became increasingly stringent with deniers," Reddit content editor Nathan Allenwrote in grist. "When a potentially controversial submission was posted, a warning would be issued stating the rules for comments (most importantly that your comment isn't a conspiracy theory) and advising that further violations of the rules could result in the commenter being banned from the forum."" 

"Allen explained further:When 97 percent of climate scientists agree that man is changing the climate, we would hope the comments would at least acknowledge if not reflect such widespread consensus. Since that was not the case, we needed more than just an ad hoc approach to correct the situation."

-Thomas Lifson: AmericanThinker.com

"Cook and his colleagues, for example, classified a peer-reviewed paper by scientist Craig Idso as explicitly supporting the ‘consensus’ position on global warming “without minimizing” the asserted severity of global warming. When Popular Technology asked Idso whether this was an accurate characterization of his paper, Idso responded, “That is not an accurate representation of my paper. The papers examined how the rise in atmospheric CO2 could be inducing a phase advance in the spring portion of the atmosphere’s seasonal CO2 cycle. Other literature had previously claimed a measured advance was due to rising temperatures, but we showed that it was quite likely the rise in atmospheric CO2 itself was responsible for the lion’s share of the change. It would be incorrect to claim that our paper was an endorsement of CO2-induced global warming.”" 

-James Taylor: forbes.com

"Key components of the manufactured "consensus" fade under scrutiny. We often hear how the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the American Meteorological Society (AMS) issued statements endorsing the so-called "consensus" view that man is driving global warming. But what you don't hear is that both the NAS and AMS never allowed member scientists to directly vote on these climate statements.

Essentially, only two dozen or so members on the governing boards of these institutions produced the "consensus" statements. It appears that the governing boards of these organizations caved in to pressure from those promoting the politically correct view of UN and Gore-inspired science. The Canadian Academy of Sciences reportedly endorsed a "consensus" global warming statement that was never even approved by its governing board.

Rank-and-file scientists are now openly rebelling. James Spann, a certified meteorologist with the AMS, openly defied the organization when he said in January that he does "not know of a single TV meteorologist who buys into the man-made global warming hype." In February a panel of meteorologists expressed unanimous climate skepticism, and one panelist estimated that 95% of his profession rejects global warming fears.

In August 2007, a comprehensive survey of peer-reviewed scientific literature from 2004-2007 revealed "Less Than Half of all Published Scientists Endorse Global Warming Theory."

"Of 539 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers 'implicit' endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis.  This is no 'consensus,'" according to an August 29, 2007 article in Daily Tech."

-Marc Morano: U.S. Senate Environment & Public Works Committee 

7% of 538 Papers on Climate Change endorsing Global Warming is not 97% it is not even 50%, it is in the vast minority.

"More than 1,000 dissenting scientists (updates previous 700 scientist report) from around the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 321-page Climate Depot Special Report — updated from the 2007 groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism about the so-called global warming “consensus” — features the skeptical voices of over 1,000 international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC. This updated 2010 report includes a dramatic increase of over 300 additional (and growing) scientists and climate researchers since the last update in March 2009. This report’s release coincides with the 2010 UN global warming summit in being held in Cancun.

The more than 300 additional scientists added to this report since March 2009 (21 months ago), represents an average of nearly four skeptical scientists a week speaking out publicly. The well over 1,000 dissenting scientists are almost 20 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers.

The chorus of skeptical scientific voices grew louder in 2010 as the Climategate scandal — which involved the upper echelon of UN IPCC scientists — detonated upon on the international climate movement. “I view Climategate as science fraud, pure and simple,” said noted Princeton Physicist Dr. Robert Austin shortly after the scandal broke. Climategate prompted UN IPCC scientists to turn on each other. UN IPCC scientist Eduardo Zorita publicly declared that his Climategate colleagues Michael Mann and Phil Jones “should be barred from the IPCC process…They are not credible anymore.” Zorita also noted how insular the IPCC science had become. “By writing these lines I will just probably achieve that a few of my future studies will, again, not see the light of publication,” Zorita wrote. A UN lead author Richard Tol grew disillusioned with the IPCC and lamented that it had been “captured” and demanded that “the Chair of IPCC and the Chairs of the IPCC Working Groups should be removed.” Tol also publicly called for the “suspension” of IPCC Process in 2010 after being invited by the UN to participate as lead author again in the next IPCC Report. [Note: Zorita and Tol are not included in the count of dissenting scientists in this report.]"

-Marc Morano: Climate Depot

Climate Change Reconsidered II, authored by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), and published by the Heartland Institute.
“is an international panel of scientists and scholars who came together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change.  NIPCC has no formal attachment to or sponsorship from any government or governmental agency.  It is wholly independent of political pressures or influences and therefore is not predisposed to produce politically motivated conclusions or policy recommendations.  NIPCC seeks to objectively analyze and interpret data and facts without conforming to any specific agenda.  This organizational structure and purpose stand in contrast to those of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is government-sponsored, politically motivated, and predisposed to believing that climate change is a problem in need of a U.N. solution.”
...The report is “comprehensive, objective, and faithful to the scientific method.”  Moreover, it is “double peer reviewed,” in that it discusses thousands of peer reviewed articles published in scientific journals, and is itself peer reviewed.  That is in sharp contrast to President Obama’s own EPA, which issued its “endangerment finding” legally authorizing regulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, without submitting the finding to its own peer review board established by federal law precisely for that purpose.  What were they so afraid of if 97% of scientists supposedly agree with them?  That violation of federal law has now been challenged in court, and is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.  But this would not be the first time that the Administration of this lawless President has openly flouted the law.
...The authors of the report do not deny that there is some effect of warming the planet from mankind’s emissions of CO2, primarily from use of traditional carbon fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas.  The argument is over how big of an effect that is, how that compares to natural causes of climate change, and whether the human caused effect threatens a catastrophe, or even severe distress, to human civilization and the environment.  The conclusion of the report is that the U.N.’s IPCC has exaggerated the amount of global warming likely to occur due to mankind’s emissions of CO2, and the warming that human civilization will cause as a result “is likely to be modest and cause no net harm to the global environment or to human well-being.”&; The primary, dominant cause of global climate change is natural causes, not human effects, the report concludes.&; “The hypothesis of human-caused global warming comes up short not merely of ‘full scientific certainty’ but of reasonable certainty or even plausibility,” the report states.

The fundamentals of the argument is that CO2 is not some toxic industrial gas, but a natural, trace gas constituting just 0.038% of the atmosphere.  For readers disadvantaged by excessive exposure to the party propaganda organ called the New York Times, that is less than 4/100ths of one percent.  The report states, “At the current level of 400 parts per million, we still live in a CO2-starved world.  Atmospheric levels (of CO2) 15 times greater existed during the pre-Cambrian period (about 550 million years ago) without known adverse effects,” such as catastrophic global warming

-Peter Ferrara: forbes

On September 17th, 2013:

 "...a group of 50 international scientists released a comprehensive new report on the science of climate change that concluded that evidence now leans against global warming resulting from human-related greenhouse gas emissions.: 

-Tony Lee: breitbart.com

That report you can read for yourself here:

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science [REPORT]

Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis -forbes

Seen Here:

http://oss.sagepub.com/content/33/11/1477.full

World's top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just QUARTER what we thought - and computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong:
A leaked copy of the world’s most authoritative climate study reveals scientific forecasts of imminent doom were drastically wrong.
The Mail on Sunday has obtained the final draft of a report to be published later this month by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the ultimate watchdog whose massive, six-yearly ‘assessments’ are accepted by environmentalists, politicians and experts as the gospel of climate science.
They are cited worldwide to justify swingeing fossil fuel taxes and subsidies for ‘renewable’ energy.
Yet the leaked report makes the extraordinary concession that over the past 15 years, recorded world temperatures have increased at only a quarter of the rate of IPCC claimed when it published its last assessment in 2007.
Back then, it said observed warming over the 15 years from 1990-2005 had taken place at a rate of 0.2C per decade, and it predicted this would continue for the following 20 years, on the basis of forecasts made by computer climate models.
But the new report says the observed warming over the more recent 15 years to 2012 was just 0.05C per decade - below almost all computer predictions.

-David Rose: DailyMail UK

So what we get from all this is and other data not represented here but freely available elsewhere; Is that some leading scientists and World Leaders are working together to manipulate data for their own objectives. Carbon Tax, Air Tax, Etc.

Real scientific data shows that the World goes through multiple cooling and warming periods every decade or couple of decades and that we are actually based on historical known levels to present in a starved CO2 environment and no where near the World Norm.

We are being manipulated for someone else's personal gain, and we need to put a stop to this once and for all.

R. William Holzkopf Jr.

Webcam Intrigue: Helping Spies Spy on you

"If you're one of those people who gets made fun of for putting a piece of tape over your webcam, don't worry—you're not crazy. Unfortunately, your paranoia is justified, since it is, in fact, possible for the internet's n'er-do-wells to secretly seize power of your computer's forward-facing camera."

http://laptops.reviewed.com/features/paranoid-or-prudent-should-you-tape-over-your-webcam?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=cpc

For Your Safety: Dragnet Spying Tactics

'It's not Spying, it's data collection' {For Your Safety} -American Senators

is like saying

'It's not PeepingTom, It's Bathroom Maintenance' {For Your Safety}

-R. William Holzkopf Jr.

Director of the ACLU’s Privacy and Technology department Ben Wizener appeared on CNN to say “this is a good day for Edward Snowden.”
Wizener believes that yesterdays court ruling from a federal judge appointed by George W. Bush which challenged the NSA’s blanket data collection program is “what happens when important legal issues are decided in open courts, where both sides get to make legal arguments. Rather than in secret courts where the government alone gets to present arguments to a court. This is, I think, a good day for Edward Snowden. This is what he had in mind. He saw programs. He doubted their legality. He saw that the oversight mechanisms had failed. That secret courts had become a rubber stamp. That congressional committees had been enabling rather than, than actually exercising oversight. And so he brought the information to the public through journalists and he brought it to the lawyers who brought this case.” 

http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/good-day-edward-snowden/#axzz2nl6EJlV2

“American Senators tell us that Brazil should not worry, because this is not ‘surveillance,’ it’s ‘data collection.’ They say it is done to keep you safe. They’re wrong. There is a huge difference between legal programs, legitimate spying, legitimate law enforcement — where individuals are targeted based on a reasonable, individualized suspicion — and these programs of dragnet mass surveillance that put entire populations under an all-seeing eye and save copies forever. These programs were never about terrorism: they’re about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They’re about power.”

With Reckless Abandon: U.S. aids hardline Islamists

I'm afraid not many will truly understand this at all, and how it will affect us.

There is a war for power and the balance is shifting incredibly close to the side that supports Rights restriction and things that look very much like forms of slavery.

This is not to say Russia is the 'Golden Savior', however Russia is the blockade that helps maintain the balance of sanity in the World currently (Irony served mainly to Americans), whatever sanity remains.

If Russia falls so does the rest of the World.

America fell a long time ago and we are currently reaping what has been sewn.

http://www.infowars.com/senator-mccain-pimps-for-cia-spawned-color-revolution-in-ukraine/

"The Islamic Front includes the Ahrar al-Sham, Jaysh al-Islam, Suqour al-Sham, Liwa al-Tawhid, Liwa al-Haqq, Ansar al-Sham, and the Kurdish Islamic Front. Jaish al-Islam, or Army of Islam, is itself a coalition of mercenary groups funded and supported by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey. Although the front reportedly excluded al-Nusra and the al-Qaeda inspired Islamic State of Iraq and the Sham (ISIS), it shares a radical jihadist ideology.
Jaysh al-Islam, formerly known as Liwa al-Islam or the Islam Brigade, is supported by Saudi Arabia and has cooperated with al-Nusra, the most successful and vicious fighting group in Syria that has pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. This collaboration is left unmentioned in corporate media reports on the new Islamic alliance." -infowars

"U.S. Moves to Support Al-Qaeda Lite in Syria. Islamic Front shares same violent jihadist ideology as al-Qaeda." -Alex Jones

http://www.infowars.com/u-s-moves-to-support-al-qaeda-lite-in-syria/