Whose version?

Whose version of "how the World should be" is right? When you look at the past 24.2 years at least, any logic reasoned person Learned in Common sense would agree the direction we have been on here in the United States alone is not indicative of sanity. 

The population is being strangled financially, our tax monies abused and mis-allocated consistently and constantly. A gov. set up to defend individual freedoms and state rights is now practically 180° from its intended purpose. Our free choices are now considered, weighted and decided by a small group of people in Washington D.C. through banking and corporate interests, and then forced upon us in the most unconstitutional manners. 

And all the 'distracted' folks ignore or worse don't even understand their situation due to either self imposed ignorance or Public gov. education. 

People still then have the gall to tell me I'm wrong, misdirected and stupid.
All the while though, the U.S. dollars has lost approx. 35% of its value in just these past 10 years.
Most of our leaders lie, blatantly, nearly everyday. Things that affect not only the place we live (Our Country), but also our lives. 
Our food chain, air and water is poisoned in most places, sicknesses related to these poisons is on the rise, and it's like looking at sheep or cattle being herded when the population is told these things. They violently protest in denial against the self evident truths, a psychological response when ones Reality is shaken.  

Our society is being taught to be its own pariah, creating a completely unsustainable future. 
We are being told and forced in some cases that we are not allowed to defend our own personal individual self against attack, that the gov. And law enforcement will do it for us, yet they cannot even fix their own issues, or help properly in time of need. Especially recently more and more law abiding Citizens are being harassed, beat, raped and killed by the same people telling us they will defend us. 

We are given solutions to problems created by the same people and groups. Often the same things with new wording. The definition of insanity; Doing the same thing over and over again with the same result but expecting different.  Either we as Citizens are being setup by an elaborate plan made to do just this or everyone has completely lost any sense of intelligence and we deserve everything we get.

Ignoring the nature of a thing, is bound to be dangerous.  I don't know what way is right, however the current way is most definitely not!

R. William Holzkopf Jr.

Paradoxical Quote of the Day

From Ben Stein

-Via Carl Paladino

Of course Ben Stein denies ever saying such a thing (which doesn't make it any less true), but he did say; this.

Failure to launch (whoops)... Deliver

So after the debate with himself, President Obama successfully gave the World and the American Citizens, absolutely nothing.

"Obama claims the “debate” — in which no debate opponent was given a minute at the microphone — is valuable.  But the whistleblowers who create such debates “endanger” us, Obama says.  This he claims without evidence.
If the debate was so useful, why not give the man who made you hold it with yourself his passport back?
Obama began Friday’s speech with a Sarah Palinesque bit of Paul Revere history.  Revere is now an honorary NSA spy. In reality, the British would have hit Revere with a hellfire missile if Obama had been their king. It all depends on which side of a war you imagine someone to be on, and on whether you imagine war itself is an acceptable form of human behavior at this late date.  Without the endless war on the world, the need for secrecy would go away, and with it the powers that secrecy bestows, and with them the arrogant speeches by rulers who clearly hold us all in contempt.
Obama’s promises not to abuse unchecked secret powers (and implied promise that none of his successors or subordinates will abuse them either) is not credible, or acceptable, while it just might be impeachable.  We’re talking here about the same government that listens in on soldiers’ phone sex, Congress members’ daily lives, and everything it can get its hands on related to the actual, rather than rhetorical, promotion of liberty, justice, or peace.  A report today quotes various members of the government with security clearance who want to murder Edward Snowden.  We’re supposed to just trust them with the right to or persons, houses, papers, and effects without probably cause or warrant? Are we also to trust the corporations they ask to do their dirty work, should the theoretical future reform of this outrage involve paying corporations to own our info?" -washingtonblog

Senator Rand Paul responds to this with:

“The American people should not expect the fox to guard the hen house,” Paul said about Obama’s promise to appoint a special White House oversight director to keep a watchful eye over the security programs." -washingtonblog

It goes without saying, if you're not getting what your paying for, either get your money back or get a new thing.