Nounrace baiting (uncountable)
- The act of using racially derisive language, actions, or other forms of communication in order to anger or intimidate or coerce a person or group of people.
Judaic Peoples are Not 'White' or 'Caucasian' by any definition currently on the books, and nor is Peruvian.
The last name Zimmerman, although Germanic, is a largely Jewish Surname, And George Zimmermans' Lineage is not completely clear on his father's side but regardless, this case has proven to be more about Stereo-typing, Racial Profiling and Discrimination rather than about facts, the only thing that matters is was he in his Right to shoot the kid or not, this is the only thing that is important and has legal grounds everything else is speculation and incitement.
I guess this shows how many ignorant people really are out there in the World today, that they believe anything, while knowing nothing.
In the end this is Racial profiling and Stereotyping by our Leaders, District attorneys and the Common Street People.
America is no longer just Pure White and Black and Latino/Hispanic, We are a mixture of Races, (Granted not the whole Country but a large segment, much larger than 40 years ago and much larger than 10 years ago), Their are Spanish People who look White, Their are Peurto Ricans, Mexicans and other Hispanics that Look straight out of Germany even though they are 3rd, 4th, or even 9th Generation Spanish Speaking from Non- English or 'Germanic' Countries. Are they 'White'? No they aren't!
Florida is like California in that they are both melting pots of extraordinary vicissitude and you have many Hispanic/Latino looking individuals who can't speak a lick of Spanish of any kind.
George Zimmerman is just being used to Bait our Society into furthering Stereo Typical Behavior and Condone Race Rioting (If it occurs), this is a purposeful destabilizing of the United States Peoples by it's own (certain individuals), Government and (Supposed) Moral Leaders and other Officials.
Why is this being done?
One reason could be this...
Well the U.S. has a long History of inserting destabilizing elements into other countries, especially what used to be considered '3rd World' Nations, usually through agencies such as those in the Clandestine trade.
This was done to cause or put pressure on some other Country we wanted something from, or even just to get our hands on resources, that normally would have been hard to get, but with a destabilized Nation no one is paying attention to all the Grabbing hands coming in from the edges while everyone is 'Angry' about whatever the focused issue is.
We have 15,000 Russian Troops under agreement by FEMA and the Russian Emergency Agency to Come over to the East Coast for a future Undisclosed disaster that well has not even occurred yet as well as for patrolling U.S. Events.
This is could very well become a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.
"Captain William Geddes of the US Army Reserve deemed the situation illegal under the Posse Comitatus Act. Violation of the federal act was also called into question during the Waco compound stand-off two decades ago. Captain Geddes stated that it is against federal statute to use American troops for police patrols. He considers the potential use of foreign troops an even further perversion of the Posse Comitatus Act."1
DEPARTMENT OF STATE PUBLICATION 7277
Disarmament Series 5
Released September 1961
“A strenuous and uninterrupted effort must be made toward the goal of general and complete disarmament; at the same time, it is important that specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible. The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process.”
This report suggests that a United Nations Peace Force be used to enforce peace as the disarmament process progresses. We seem to be in part being setup for something, and something big. Especially with all 50 U.S. States Now (Including Illinois and California), with some form or other of Concealed Carry law, it seems that even some of our State Legislators see something around the corner. When Representatives and Senators who in the past voted against such things vote for them, One must really start to pay attention as to the 'Why'.
This brings about a scary question, Will our Military members seek to uphold the Constitution or decide to Follow Illigitmate orders?
Well the UCMJ Does have a provision for this:
"The Uniform Code of Military Justice is more concerned about failure of military personnel to obey legitimate orders than it is about refusal to obey illegitimate orders, but it does address the subject. In Section 16c(1)(c) it provides:
Lawfulness. A general order or regulation is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders or for some other reason is beyond the authority of the official issuing it.And in Section 14c(2)(a)(i):
Inference of lawfulness. A order requiring the performance of a military duty or act may be inferred to be lawful and it is disobeyed at the peril of the subordinate. This inference does not apply to a patently illegal order, such as one that directs the commission of a crime.These provisions allow for the disobedience of illegal orders, but such orders may themselves constitute a crime, or be part of a criminal conspiracy, either under military or civilian law. Under federal law, 18 USC 242, it is illegal for anyone under the color of law to deprive any person of the rights, privileges or immunities secured by the U.S. Constitution, and under 18 USC 241 it is illegal to conspire to violate such rights. It is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. This could be applied to military personnel who abuse the rights of citizens, either military or civilian. The UCMJ also defines an Article 134 offense: Impersonating a commissioned, warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer, or an agent or official. This could apply to a military officer who impersonates a civilian official in an action against civilians. This includes actions taken under martial law. In RCM 202(a):
The exercise of jurisdiction under Article 2(a)(11) in peacetime has been held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States. Article 2(a)(10) has also been limited."2So Is the George Zimmerman Case really that important? On a level of Criminal behavior and who was really wrong yes, on a level of National proportions, no. We should really be looking at why we are being Baited, and what is actually going on that some in the U.S. don't want you to see.
Those Race Riots? That's 'seems' to be a lie since Photos and Videos are from the 2011 Vancouver Stanley Cup Riots. http://www.buzzfeed.com/ellievhall/this-is-not-a-video-of-people-rioting-over-the-george-zimmer
R. William Holzkopf Jr.